1983 ,THE ROBERT S. HARRINGTON NIBIRU DEBATE

IS IT A STAR IS IT A PLANET

catching a wobbly 

Its  of one of the strangest of all the conspiracy theory's out there linked to NIBIRU or planet 9.  But after all the time that has been wasted on going back and forth arguing whether Robert s Harrington and co at the us naval observatory had indeed seen a "Wiggle" in the van Biesbroeck 8 star indicating a companion in orbit.

However current google hits on VB8
blatantly state it does not even exist never mind 8b it's companion.

So what do you do ? Or how would you get to the truth of the matter ?

WAS VB8 REAL WAS IT SEEN BACK IN 1993 

Well we have to look closer to the source , 

Here the timeline is essentially to uncovering the blatant cover ups misdirection and unfortunate ending.

Please note before 1983 Brown dwarfs were only a theory!!!

here we have our current standing on brown dwarfs

1983 : Robert .S Harrington and co at flagstaff observatory , Find that the star VB8 showing a small deviation in it's natural motion indicating a lower mass object in tow.

This binary system in 1983 was 21 light years from earth.It was observed to be very dim .But this is where it go's pear shaped .

With his death later in the year and the controversy surrounding his work and belief that he had in the planet 9 hypotheses and all the wonders this type of discovery would mean to the Astronomical observations fields. Including the Xray observations.

Commentary included article's stating his work was disproved 6 months before his death....mmm

That's strange because in the latter part of 1994 , Donald McCarthy , jr at the Steward observatory 

Managed not only detect vb8 but its companion 8b too this was done with the Kitt peak  4 metre telescope in the infrared wavelength.

8B was estimated to be about the same size as Jupiter and VB8 10 to 80 times more massive
8B also was observed to be 100 000 times dimmer then its companion and was found to be orbiting VB8 by 6.5 au quite close to our own Jupiter and sun's distance from each other.
Many other observations including the cooler environment observed , now a proven factor of a Brown Dwarfs and they concluded it was indeed the first discovered outside our solar system. observations that are hidden in the archives of libraries long forgotten.

WHAT DEAN ARE YOU SERIOUS ? IS IT COMMON KNOWLEDGE ?
Well unless you have access to the original published works and Hard copies , Not floating articles on the Internet ...Then NO!!!!!!
BUT I DO AND IT WAS EASY TO SEE THE PATTERNS ,I WILL RELEASE ALL ORIGINALS
OR CLEAR SCANS ...BUT LETS GET BACK TO IT

This not only was the start of getting onto the brown dwarf identification train but a myriad of understanding of x-ray work with binary systems  and the behaviour they exhibit.We will dissect that data in another paper

So we look at current data or information on the VB8 or the companion 8B here in late August 2016 Here At SKYLINE ANOMALIES we have found so many contradictory articles.

Firstly VB10 is actually acknowledged as a dim red dwarf....Yes slight name change and the VB8 and 8B relegated to almost a pseudoscienctific anomaly referred to as the disappearing observation .
We must remember this man is not here to defend himself ,He was so respected in his field.

If we go back into hard copy scientific journals we find a different views from what we were taught happened . All published works from the 1983 study continued to be published further as a real physically proved phenomenon till the 1990 era , But if we Google it or search for it in 2016 the information is different to the actually accounts from the  published works.So different in fact it's quite blatantly false and disseminated to try draw us away from the truth.

SO HOW DO YOU KNOW IT'S A TRUE 

before computers became the game changer in information. We had books, journals and encyclopedias 

scientific study was peer reviewed and published .

So if we go back in time pull out the originals ,In this case we are looking at the 1980 -1994 era 

So if we pull out even those heavy encyclopedias say 1996 ,
Go to the astronomy section 

You will see that its still continues to back the VB8 data, Strange because the reports in the 2000-2016

differ saying it was disproved 6 months before his death ,than why would the scientific community continue to refer to his work .And in fact 1 year later it was observed by another team .

BUT WHY HAVE THEY DISSEMINATED FALSE INFORMATION

Well if you look at the big picture ,He believed in a planetary body out there that was mucking around with our planets, Whether it is Nibiru or Nemesis The fact that such an elaborate cover up was put into place over the course of 30 years merits further scrutiny.

   

PEACE 

DEANWILL120